Prior

Prior v. Diggs

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 1017·3 Cal. Unrep. 565·31 P. 155
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 1, 1892No. 14,874California1,184 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action on November 24, 1888, to recover damages in the sum of $2,000 for the alleged breach of a written contract, which reads as follows:

By his answer the defendant denied all the averments of the complaint, and set up numerous defenses. The case was tried before a jury, and the verdict and judgment were in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and has appealed from the judgment and order. The Civil Code provides that “the goodwill of -a business is the expectation of continued public patronage” (section 992), and that “the goodwill of a business is property, transferable like any other” (section 993). It also provides that “every contract by which anyone is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void” (section 1673), except that “one who sells the goodwill of a business may agree with the buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business within a specified county, city, or a part thereof, so long as the buyer, or any person deriving title to the goodwill from him, carries on a like business therein” (section 1674). Here the goodwill sold was only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.