Jones

Jones v. Chalfant

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 1039·3 Cal. Unrep. 585·31 P. 257
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 1, 1892No. 14,290California1,037 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of one hundred and sixty acres of land in Mendocino county. The case was tried before a jury on June 15, 1889, and on that day a verdict was returned and entered in favor of the defendants. Immediately after the entry of the verdict, the defendant’s attorney prepared the draft of a judgment, and handed it to the clerk of the court, with a request that he enter the same. The court did not order the case to be reserved for argument or further consideration, or grant a stay of proceedings, but the clerk failed to enter the judgment until September 12,1890. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on a prepared statement of the ease, and his motion was denied on April 26, 1890. On September 3, 1890, the plaintiff gave notice to defendants that he would move the court to set aside the verdict and decision on the ground that no judgment had been entered in the case, and defendants had neglected to demand and have judgment entered therein for more than six months after they were entitled thereto. This motion was heard by the court, and denied, on September 12, 1890, and an order was then made directing the clerk to enter the judgment, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.