In re Berton's Estate

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 1073·3 Cal. Unrep. 681·31 P. 576
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 7, 1892No. 15,035California1,422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This appeal is from an order of the probate court denying the petition of appellant, as executor of the will of the deceased, for a distribution of the estate. The petition was filed at the same time as the account for final settlement of his accounts as executor. Due notice was given, and at the time appointed the final account was approved and settled. Due proof was made of notice to creditors that the time for the presentation of claims had elapsed, and that all claims against the estate, and the expenses of administration, and all taxes levied on the estate, had been paid, and that there was left in the hands of the executor for distribution, $84,-450.94. The testatrix left two children—a son and a daughter. The record shows that the son was then, when the final account was settled, nineteen years of age and the daughter over eighteen. The will bears date April 18, 1887. The *682 executor was appointed May 3, 1888. The final settlement was November 12, 1891. It is said that distribution was refused on the ground that the will had not then been fully executed; that, according to its terms, the estate could not then be distributed. The material portion of the will reads as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.