Taylor

Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. Taylor

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 1042·3 Cal. Unrep. 697·31 P. 1122
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 8, 1892No. 14,182California639 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

This is an action to recover from the defendants, as copartners, the sum of $1,815.59 for lumber sold and delivered to them by plaintiff. The defendant Lund failed to answer, and his default was entered. The other defendants answered, denying all material allegations of the complaint. The cause was tried by the court, and a joint judgment was rendered against all the defendants. The defendants Taylor and Somervell appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The principal point made by appellants is that the finding by the court that the defendants were copartners is not justified by the evidence. On June 18, 1889, the defendant Lund entered into a written agreement with Antonelle and Doe, whereby he agreed to do certain work on section 8 of the seawall along the waterfront of San Francisco, and to furnish all materials therefor, and to purchase the lumber needed for the performance of the agreement on his part from the plaintiff. The defendants Taylor and Somervell executed to Antonelle and Doe their bond, guaranteeing that Lund would perform his contract. On June 20, 1889, Lund assigned his agreement with Antonelle and Doe to Taylor and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.