Wiley

Wiley v. California Hosiery Co.

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1021·3 Cal. Unrep. 814·32 P. 522
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1893No. 14,386California3,003 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. A jury trial was had, and the plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for $1,000 damages. The appeal is from this judgment and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The complaint alleged that on February 10, 1887, plaintiff and the defendant (a corporation) mutually agreed that plaintiff should serve the defendant from that date until October 31, 1887, as a traveling salesman to sell and take orders for defendant’s goods, for which plaintiff was to receive a commission of seven and one-half per centum, and pay his own expenses; that, as a further inducement, defendant was to give plaintiff the exclusive right to sell its goods in Utah, Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming, New Mexico and Kansas; and, as breaches of this agreement, plaintiff alleged that in May, 1887, defendant, while plaintiff was faithfully discharging his duties, sent another salesman to Salt Lake City and Ogden, in Utah, who made sales in those places amounting to $2,500, and that on July 1, 1887, the defendant wrongfully discharged plaintiff; that thereby he was prevented from selling at least $20,000 of defendant’s goods; and, as another…

Concurring Opinion

Haven, J.

I concur in the judgment.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.