Hamilton

People v. Hamilton

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1088·3 Cal. Unrep. 825·32 P. 526
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1893No. 14,636California2,029 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

The respondent was tried and found guilty of omitting and refusing to pay over to his successor in office moneys received by him as county clerk. On the day fixed *827 for passing sentence, the defendant moved for a new trial, and also in arrest of judgment. The motion for a new trial was heard, but not disposed of, and the court granted an order arresting the judgment; and from this order the people appeal.

The information was drawn under subdivision 10 of section 424 of the Penal Code, which provides: “Each officer of this state or of any county, .... and every other person charged with the receipt, safekeeping, transfer, or disbursement of public moneys, who willfully omits or refuses to pay over to any officer or person authorized by law to receive the same any money received by him under any duty imposed by law to pay over the same, is punishable,” etc. The information, omitting the title and conclusion, is as follows: “M. D. Hamilton is accused by the district attorney of the said county, by this information, of the crime of omitting and refusing to pay over money received by him under duty imposed by law to pay over the same. Committed as follows: The said M. D. Hamilton,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.