Fisher

Fisher v. Hopkins

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1022·4 Cal. Unrep. 8·33 P. 438
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 8, 1893No. 13,171California324 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

It is alleged in the complaint that while plaintiff was the owner, and entitled to the possession, of certain personal property (household furniture), the defendant wrongfully converted the same to his own use, to the damage of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,000. The defendant denies the alleged title of the plaintiff, and justifies the taking and alleged conversion of the property under writs of attachment and execution against one Minerva Button, issued to him as sheriff, alleging that the furniture, in question was the property of Minerva Button. The case was tried by the court, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $951.95 and costs. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only grounds upon which a reversal of the order and judgment is asked are that the findings of fact are not justified by the evidence. The plaintiff claims to derive her title to the property from Minerva Button, through an absolute bill of sale and delivery of possession from Mrs. Button to Josiah Lean, Robert Peoples and Lydia Peoples, executed prior to the issuance of the writs by virtue of which the defendant took and sold the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.