Malic

Malic v. Fox

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1068·4 Cal. Unrep. 19·33 P. 441
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 9, 1893No. 14,883California272 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

Action to recover from the defendant, Fox, and his guarantors, Witzemann & Staiger, copartners, the sum of $431.29, for goods sold and delivered to Fox by plaintiff’s assignor, one H. A. Smith, who did business under the name of “Smith’s Cash Store.” The action is founded upon a written guaranty of Witzemann & Staiger to the San Francisco and North Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, which owned and navigated the steamer “James M. Donahue,” in connection with its road, to transport passengers across the bay of San Francisco, given under the following circumstances: In the latter part of May, 1889, Fox applied to the railroad company for the position of steward of the steamer “James M. Donahue,” with the privilege of keeping a restaurant thereon for passengers and employees, and was informed by the agent of the company (IT. C. Whiting) that he could be appointed to the position only on the condition that he would give a bond with satisfactory sureties that he would pay all bills contracted by him for goods and supplies for said restaurant. Upon his promise to give the required bond or guaranty, Fox was appointed to and took the position *21 June 1, 1889, but did not give the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.