Sanborn

Sanborn v. Cunningham

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1139·4 Cal. Unrep. 95·33 P. 894
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 15, 1893No. 14,994California2,813 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This action was brought by Charles Ford, A. A. Morey and J. S. Menasco, copartners in the name of Charles Ford & Co., against J. F. Cunningham, James Dougherty and Henry L. Middleton, copartners in the name of J. F. Cunningham & Co., to recover $406.08, balance of an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered, alleging that the whole value of the goods sold was $906.08, of which $500 had been paid. The answer denied a sale and delivery to the defendants of goods, etc., of the aggregate value of $906.08, or of any greater value than $156.08, which last-named sum they admitted to be due and unpaid. Upon the first trial, *97 plaintiffs had judgment, and upon appeal the judgment was reversed, and a new trial ordered: Ford v. Cunningham, 87 Cal. 209 , 25 Pac. 403 . Afterward, Charles Ford died, and Lucius Sanborn and William Vanderhurst, his executors, were substituted as parties plaintiff in his stead. The sum of $156.08, admitted by defendants to be due, was for three lots of potatoes sold and delivered to them by Ford & Co. The remaining $250 is part of the sum of $750 agreed to be paid to Ford & Co. for a lot of barley, but whether the firm of J. F. Cunningham &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.