Moore

Moore v. Mott

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1076·4 Cal. Unrep. 269·34 P. 345
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 7, 1893No. 19,158California1,204 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This action is upon an undertaking given to procure the release of property from an attachment. The writ was issued in an action brought by Alfred Moore, as plaintiff, against one Dorward. The undertaking is in the form prescribed by statute, and a copy is attached to the complaint. It recites the issuance and levy of the attachment, that the defendant had applied to the court for an order releasing and discharging the property from the operation of the attachment, and that the court had fixed the value of the property attached at $1,200; and in consideration of the premises the sureties (defendants herein) undertook and promised that, in case the plaintiff recovered judgment, defendants would, on demand, redeliver the attached property to the sheriff, to be applied to the payment of the judgment, or, in default thereof, the sureties would pay, on demand, to the plaintiff, the sum of $1,200. It is averred in the complaint that plaintiff, on the 8th of November, 1889, recovered a judg *270 ment against the said Dorward, in the said attachment suit, for $831.63, and that due demand had been made on said defendants for payment. The defendants, appearing by their respective counsel,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.