Vital

People v. Vital

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1066·4 Cal. Unrep. 320·34 P. 617
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 2, 1893No. 20,957California266 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The minutes of the trial of this case and which constitute a part of the record,-state that the court read to the jury “instructions asked by the respective parties, and allowed by the court, and those given by the court on its own motion”; but the record filed here does not contain any of the instructions thus referred to, except those given upon request of the defendant. One of the points made by the appellant is that the court erred in omitting to instruct the jury that they had the discretion, in case they found' the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, to relieve him from the extreme penalty of death, and to say, by their verdict, that his punishment should be confinement in the state prison for life. We do not think we should determine this question upon the record now before us; at least until an opportunity is given to the attorney general to supply the instructions given by the superior court upon its own motion and upon request of the people, if such instructions were actually given. It is the duty of a judge to properly indorse all instructions given on his own motion, and when so indorsed they form a part of the record on appeal: People v. January, 77 Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.