Porter

Porter v. Fisher

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1102·4 Cal. Unrep. 324·34 P. 700
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1893No. 18,108California1,773 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Porter, as assignee of one Abbott, brought suit against appellant on several causes of action, among which was one for the sum of $2,500, as commissions claimed to have been earned by Abbott in effecting a transfer of property between appellant Fisher and one J. A. Baxter. The property Fisher conveyed and transferred to Baxter consisted of two hundred and eighty acres of land in Tulare county, together with stock and personal property of a large amount; and the property conveyed and transferred by Baxter to Fisher was one hundred and seven acres of land at Byron, Contra Costa county, together with all the personal property thereon. Abbott claimed that he was employed by Fisher as a broker to sell or exchange his said property, real and .personal, and for which he was to receive a commission of five per cent. His employment, however, as such broker, was not in writing. The cause was tried before the court and a jury, and plaintiff, as assignee of Abbott, recovered on account of the said commissions the sum of $1,000. The gross recovery by the plaintiff was for a larger sum, but no controversy is made here, except as to the recovery of said $1,000. The appeal is from the judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.