Ritchey

Ritchey v. McMichael

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 1098·4 Cal. Unrep. 384·35 P. 151
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 26, 1893No. 19,231California1,656 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

In April, 1888, one Buell was the owner of an interest in certain lands in Los Angeles county and the defendant was the owner of a similar interest therein. The defendant was a resident of California, but was at that time in Louisville, Kentucky, where he had formerly resided, and where the plaintiff was then residing. He had known the plaintiff and had been on friendly terms with him for many years, and while there represented to him and one Curtice that Buell would sell his interest in the lands for $2,750, and urged them to purchase this interest, representing that it was of *385 much greater value, and offered to make the purchase for them at the lowest price for which he could induce Buell to sell it. Neither the plaintiff nor Curtice had ever seen the lands, nor had they any knowledge of their value, or of the price at which Buell would sell his interest, but, relying upon the representations of the defendant, authorized him to make the purchase for them from Buell on terms of one-third cash, one-third in six months and one-third in twelve months, thereafter. The defendant returned to California, and on the 9th of May wrote to the plaintiff to the effect that he had effected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.