Sands

People v. Sands

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1296·4 Cal. Unrep. 424·35 P. 330
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 1894No. 15,369California1,894 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto, brought by the people on relation of Fred Y. Wood against John A. Sands to try the title of the relator and the defendant, respectively, to the office of city justice of the peace of the city of Oakland. The office became vacant by the resignation of the prior incumbent, and the mayor of the city, acting under the “freeholders’ charter,” appointed the defendant to fill the vacancy. Sands thereupon qualified and entered upon the duties of said office. The board of supervisors of Alameda county, assuming that the power of appointment to said office was vested in them, appointed the relator to fill the same vacancy, and he also qualified and demanded possession of the office. The cause was submitted in the court *425 below upon an agreed statement of facts, which was adopted as a finding, in which it is conceded that each of these persons possesses all the qualifications required by law, and that the sole question is as to where the power of appointment to fill said vacancy is vested. The superior court held that said power was vested in the board of supervisors, and gave judgment in favor of the relator, Wood, and defendant Sands…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.