Johnson v. Johnson

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1181·4 Cal. Unrep. 446·35 P. 637
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 1894No. 15,273California928 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

Action for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty in which the plaintiff prevailed. Besides the divorce, the decree awarded to plaintiff the custody of an infant son of the parties and the greater portion of the community property, but no permanent alimony. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds that it is ambiguous, uncertain, and unintelligible, in that it does not appear therefrom “when or where defendant was guilty of the alleged extreme cruelty,” nor “what was the nature, character, or extent of the alleged acts of extreme cruelty.” The allegations of the complaint charging cruelty are as follows: “That during their marriage defendant has been guilty of extreme cruelty to plaintiff, in this: That about three years ago said defendant struck plaintiff without cause, thereby rendering her insensible, and since said time said defendant has wrongfully and unjustly, and without any provocation, continually used vile and offensive language to plaintiff whenever said plaintiff and defendant have been together, thereby inflicting upon said plaintiff grievous mental suffering, by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.