Jones

Jones v. Los Angeles & P. Ry. Co.

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1271·4 Cal. Unrep. 755·37 P. 656
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 1894No. 19,315California496 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This action was brought by plaintiffs to declare forfeited a certain right of way granted by them to the Los Angeles County Railroad Company, the predecessor in interest of the defendant, upon the ground that certain conditions subsequent attached to the grant had not been complied with. Defendant interposed a general demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled by consent and an answer filed. The defendant did not appear at the trial, and plaintiffs had judgment, from which defendant appeals. The only question presented is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. The demurrer being general, the fact that it was overruled by consent is immaterial. One of the conditions of the grant of the easement was the erection and construction of the road on the line designated and the operation of the road when constructed. The second condition was that the company should establish two stations on the line granted, the particular points of each of said stations to be selected by the parties of the first part (the plaintiffs herein). It is further provided in the agreement that, upon the completion of the road, it should be operated continuously and without interruption; and again, if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.