Banbury

San Francisco & Fresno Land Co. v. Banbury

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1257·4 Cal. Unrep. 789·37 P. 801
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 1894No. 19,370California1,725 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

In June, 1892, the plaintiff, as the owner and successor in interest of sixty-seven lots of land in McPherson’s addition to the town of McPherson, formerly in the county of Los Angeles, but now in the county of Orange, sought to "redeem them from a sale for delinquent taxes, made to the state of California March 12, 1889, and for that purpose tendered to the defendant Banbury, as treasurer of the county of Los Angeles, the sum of $225.00. It is conceded that this amount of money was sufficient to effect the redemption, unless the sum of three dollars for each lot, amounting to $201, for giving the notice of an intention to apply for a deed and the affidavit therefor, fixed as a fee for giving such notice by section 3785 of the Political Code, should also have been tendered. The county auditor, in his estimate of the amount to be paid for redemption, included this item in the certificates issued by him under the provision of section 3817 of the Political Code, and the treasurer refused to accept the amount tendered, or to give to the plaintiff the certificates named in said section. The plaintiff thereupon brought this action to compel the treasurer to accept the sum tendered as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.