Wong Lang v. Alaska Imp. Co.

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1237·4 Cal. Unrep. 867·38 P. 104
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1894No. 15,575California1,092 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

The action is upon a written agreement between plaintiff and defendant, whereby the plaintiff, in consideration of certain specified payments to be made by the defendant, agreed to do and cause to be done, by himself and about ninety other Chinamen, to be employed by him, certain labor in and about the fish cannery of defendant during the fishing season of 1891; and thereupon it is alleged in the complaint “that plaintiff fully and faithfully performed each and every of the covenants on his part in said agreement contained, and that on the twenty-third day of November, 1891, there became due and payable to plaintiff, under and in accordance with the terms of said agreement, for and on account of said performance on his part, the sum of $23,775”; and it is further alleged that defendant has paid plaintiff only $21,155 on account, leaving still due, owing and unpaid, $2,620, for which plaintiff prays judgment. The defendant, by answer, denied that plaintiff had fully performed his contract, and denied that any sum was due, owing or unpaid to plaintiff; alleged full payment of the amount found due according to the terms of the agreement upon an accounting and settlement between…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.