Silva

Silva v. Silva

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1212·4 Cal. Unrep. 870·38 P. 105
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 31, 1894No. 15,623California398 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

It is alleged in the complaint in this action that the defendant holds a certain lot of land in trust for the plaintiff, and prays that it be so adjudged by the court. The answer of the defendant is a denial of the alleged trust. Judgment passed for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

A careful reading of the transcript of one hundred pages and sixty pages of briefs for appellant has led me to the conclusion that the appeal is totally destitute of merit. In limine, counsel for appellant complain that the court erred in substituting for their statement of the evidence an ‘ ‘ epitome ’ ’ of the stenographic report thereof, which does not fully nor truly represent it. But of this there is not the slightest evidence in the statement or bill of exceptions on which the motion for new trial was made. It does not appear, even, that appellant’s original statement of the evidence was amended or changed in any respect. One of the grounds of the motion, as stated in the notice of the motion, was newly discovered evidence, and it is contended that the court erred in not granting the motion on this ground. But, in the first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.