Whitmore

Whitmore v. Ainsworth

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1206·4 Cal. Unrep. 872·38 P. 196
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 2, 1894No. 15,547California1,433 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action brought to set aside and annul a deed executed on or about July 26, 1890, by Charlotte S. Jones to the defendant A. G. Ainsworth, upon the grounds that the same was without consideration, fraudulent and void. Defendants had judgment, from which, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

The action was commenced in the name of Charlotte S. Jones as plaintiff, who departed this life before the trial, and the present plaintiffs, the executors of her last will, were thereupon substituted as plaintiffs in the cause. A synopsis of the complaint may be thus stated: (1) On the twenty-second day of July, 1890, Charlotte S. Jones, the plaintiff, acquired a legal title to the lot of land described in the complaint by deed from Welles Whitmore. (2) Plaintiff was at the time a servant of defendant, who went with her, on the twenty-sixth day of July, to the office of Whitmore, for the purpose of receiving said deed, and thence to the office of the county recorder, where defendant represented to plaintiff that, in order to have said deed recorded, it was necessary for her to acknowledge it; a'nd plaintiff, believing this statement to be true,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.