Blake

Board of Education v. Blake

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1280·4 Cal. Unrep. 891·38 P. 536
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 3, 1894No. 15,641California1,108 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Defendant Blake erected an addition to a school building under a contract with the plaintiff, and completed the same September 14, 1892, at which date there remained unpaid $829.45 of the contract price, which, by the terms of the contract, was not payable until thirty-five days after the completion of the work, as required by the statute, a sum insufficient to pay all the subcontractors and material-men in full. Nine days after completion appellants commenced an action at law against Blake, the contractor, and served process of garnishment upon the board of education. Afterward De Gear and other claimants (who afterward assigned to him) served upon the board notices of their several claims, as provided by section 1184 of the Code of Civil Procedure, some of these notices being served before the expiration of the thirty-five days and others after such expiration. After these notices were all served, respondent De Gear also commenced an action against the contractor, and garnished the board of education, and both appellants and respondent obtained their several judgments against the contractor. The board of education thereupon commenced this action, paid said sum remaining in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.