Shain

Shain v. Du Jardin

Good Law
1894 Cal. LEXIS 1269·4 Cal. Unrep. 905·38 P. 529
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1894No. 15,582California655 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action to recover $440.30 for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by Rice & Co., assignors of plaintiff, to the defendant. The cause was tried by the court, without a jury, and written findings filed, upon which judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The sole point made by appellant is that his motion for a nonsuit should have been granted. The motion was based upon the ground that the proofs failed to establish the sale of .goods, wares and merchandise by Rice & Co. to defendant, or that there was evidence of the shle, delivery or value of any goods. A single witness was called for plaintiff, who testified, in substance, that he was manager in San Francisco for Rice & Co., liquor dealers of Covington, Kentucky; that he knew defendant, had interviews and correspondence with him. He said Rice & Co. sold defendant goods. He had been a customer of that firm before witness became manager, and, without consult *907 ing the books, could not tell the extent of defendant’s purchases. The witness then stated that the balance due June, 1892, was $547; that defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.