Eaton

Eaton v. Metz

Good Law
1895 Cal. LEXIS 1148·5 Cal. Unrep. 59·40 P. 947
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 27, 1895No. 19,512California1,685 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery to recover the possession from defendant of thirteen horses, one four-horse wagon, and one set of double harness, or their value, alleged to be $2,000. The amended answer contains two separate defenses. The first denies the ownership or possession of the plaintiff of the property described in the complaint, or any part thereof, or that it is of any value exceeding $1,200, or that defendant at any time took the same, or any part thereof, from the possession of the plaintiff, or that he wrongfully withholds the same from said plaintiff. The second defense avers that A. C. Eaton was and is the owner of the property described in the complaint, and 1 justifies taking the same as a constable of the township of Perris, in the county of San Diego, under and hy virtue of sundry writs of attachment issued out of justice court in and for said township, in actions pending therein in favor of sundry persons against said A. C. Eaton. Defendant further averred as follows: “Defendant, here answering, is informed, and believes, and therefore alleges, that the said Fred. B. Eaton claims to be the owner of the property described in his complaint herein, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.