Delafield

Delafield v. San Francisco & S. M. Railway Co.

Good Law
1895 Cal. LEXIS 1137·5 Cal. Unrep. 71·40 P. 958
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 27, 1895No. 15,911California1,092 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

Plaintiff sues as assignee of Harding & Forbes, attorneys at law, to recover $1,700 for professional services alleged to have been performed by the latter for the San Francisco & San Mateo Eailway Company and the S. S. Construction Company (corporations), at their instance and request, and for which, it is alleged, the former company and defendant Joost promised to pay said sum of $1,700. At the close of the evidence, counsel for defendants moved a non-suit in favor of the S. S. Construction Company, whereupon counsel for plaintiff, by leave of court, and without objection by any one of the defendants, dismissed' the action as against the defendants Joost and the S. S. Construction Company, and prayed for judgment against the San Francisco & San Mateo *72 Railway Company alone, for the whole sum demanded, and this prayer was granted by the court. The San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Company brings this appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll with a bill of exceptions as to matters of law and fact.

1. The principal point made by appellant is that the complaint does not support the judgment. No doubt the S.'S. Construction Company and Joost were improperly joined as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.