Lyons

Santa Cruz Rock Paving Co. v. Lyons

Good Law
5 Cal. Unrep. 260·43 P. 599
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 1896No. 15,760California2,618 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $482.88, alleged to be due from defendants to plaintiff for setting granite curbs, and grading and paving the street, in front of a certain lot in the city of San Francisco, and to foreclose a lien on the lot for the said sum, together with the cost of verifying and filing the claim of lien and a reasonable attorney’s fee. The defendants, James M. and Ellen Lyons, were husband and wife, and had been such for about twenty-one years. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant Ellen Lyons was at all the times mentioned therein the owner of record of the said lot, and that the same was and is community property; that her husband was the reputed owner of it, and that he requested the plaintiff to do the work while he was such reputed owner; that he entered into a written contract with plaintiff for its performance, “both in his own individual behalf and as the agent of his wife, Ellen, and in her behalf, though in his own name”; that he individually, and on behalf of his wife, promised to pay plaintiff for the work done; and that she “had full knowledge of said contract and of the performance of said work prior to and during the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.