Silva

Silva v. Spangler

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1080·5 Cal. Unrep. 277·43 P. 617
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 1896S. F. No. 104California1,355 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This action is brought to abate an embankment constructed by defendant, whereby the surface water is alleged to be prevented from flowing from and over a private right of way owned and possessed by him, the said plaintiff, and to enjoin defendant from maintaining such embankment. Plaintiff had a decree as prayed for, and this appeal is from the judgment, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The amended complaint of plaintiff was demurred to, upon two grounds, viz., “that said amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action,” and upon the further ground “that plaintiff does not allege any damage different or peculiar than that resulting to the common public. ’ ’ The last cause of demurrer assigned is not one for which a demurrer can be properly interposed, under section 430 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The same cause may, however, be urged, in a proper ease, under the objection that the “complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The contention of appellant seems to be based upon the theory that the amended complaint contains no allegation that the roadway in question is a private road,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.