Ellis

Ellis v. Tulare County

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1064·5 Cal. Unrep. 327·44 P. 575
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 7, 1896Sac. No. 70California978 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

During the year 1894, John G-. Ellis, the plaintiff, was a supervisor and ex-officio road commissioner for supervisor district No. 5 in Tulare county. As such road commissioner, he performed services in his district for payment of which he, in January, 1895, presented a claim to the board of supervisors of the county for allowance. The claim was properly itemized and verified, and was for one hundred and seventeen days’ services, at six dollars per day. The *328 board rejected the claim, and thereupon he commenced this action to recover the sum of $702, alleged to be due him for the services so rendered. The case was tried by the court, upon a stipulation as to the facts; and on June 25, 1895, the court rendered its decision, and ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount claimed. Judgment was accordingly so entered, and from it the defendant appeals, without any statement or bill of exceptions.

In 1894, Tulare county was a county of the eleventh class, and the only question is, Was the plaintiff, under the law as it then stood, entitled to the compensation demanded for his services as road commissioner? Prior to 1891 the Political Code contained the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.