Tulare Irrigation District v. Kaweah Canal & Irrigation Co.

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1114·5 Cal. Unrep. 330·44 P. 662
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 7, 1896Sac. No. 66California1,382 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This cause was tried by the court, and findings and judgment were for the defendant; and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment and an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff is a corporation, organized under the act of the legislature known as the “Wright act,” for the purpose of supplying water for irrigating the lands within the district so organized. The defendant is a corporation organized *331 under the general statute, and owned certain water rights, dams, canals, ditches, real estate, etc., from which the Tulare irrigation district could be supplied with water for the purposes for which it was organized. Under these circumstances plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement whereby the defendant sold and conveyed said property to the plaintiff in consideration of the sum of $150,000, payable in the bonds of the plaintiff at par. The deed executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, after describing certain lands, water rights, canals, etc., as to which there is no controversy, concluded the description of property and rights conveyed, as follows: “Also all right, title, and interest of the first party (the defendant) in and to all dams, headgates, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.