Conroy

Kennedy v. Conroy

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1054·5 Cal. Unrep. 337·44 P. 795
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 28, 1896Sac. No. 58California1,363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the conversion by defendant of certain sheep and hogs alleged to be the property of the. plaintiff. The defendant justifies the taking of the property upon the ground that he was sheriff of the county of Placer, and as such seized and sold the property under an execution against C. Quinn, whose property he alleged it was at the time of such seizure. On the twelfth day of August, 1893, Quinn executed and delivered to plaintiff a lease demising to him a farm in Placer county for the term of two years and two months, and on the same day made and delivered to plaintiff a bill of sale of livestock and other personal property then on said farm, including *338 the sheep and hogs in question. The consideration named in the bill of sale is $2,600, and the testimony tends to show that Quinn was indebted to plaintiff at the time the bill of sale was executed (though in what amount does not appear), and that the cancellation of the pre-existing debt was the consideration for the sale. These instruments were executed and delivered to plaintiff at the town of Lincoln, and plaintiff (who is the stepson of Quinn) testified: “When I received this bill of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.