Easterbrook

Easterbrook v. City & County of San Francisco

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1077·5 Cal. Unrep. 341·44 P. 800
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 1, 1896S. F. No. 187California1,174 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action brought by the appellant to recover from the respondent money paid under protest for Dupont street taxes, levied under authority of the act of March 23, 1876, entitled “An act to authorize the widening of Dupont street, in the city of San Francisco” (Stats. *342 1875-76, p. 433). A demurrer was interposed to the complaint by defendant, which was sustained by the court; and, plaintiff declining to amend, judgment was entered in favor of defendant, from which judgment plaintiff appeals. The cause comes up on the judgment-roll, and the sufficiency of the complaint constitutes the sole question for consideration.

The action is prosecuted under section 3819 of the Political Code, adopted February 27, 1893, which is in part as follows: “At any time after the duplicate assessment-book has been received by the tax collector, and the taxes have become payable, the owner of any property assessed therein, who may claim that the assessment is void in whole or in part, may pay the same to the tax collector under protest, which protest shall be in writing, and shall specify whether thé whole assessment is claimed to be void, or if a part only, what portion, and in either case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.