Kendall

Kendall v. Earl

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1069·5 Cal. Unrep. 351·44 P. 791
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 4, 1896No. 18,392California2,008 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Plaintiff resides at Sacramento, and grows fruit in that county. The defendants are commission merchants doing business at Chicago, Illinois. On October 9, 1889, plaintiff shipped to defendants 22,758 pounds of dried French prunes, and 3,937 pounds of soft-shell almonds, under the terms stated in the following contract:

Milton Brown was an agent of defendants, and no question is made to the validity of the contract. In November, 1889, the defendants sold the prunes for six and one-half cents per pound, and the almonds at eleven cents, without communicating with the plaintiff, making a difference against the plaintiff of $678.47, to recover which sum plaintiff brought this suit. A jury trial was waived, and the court made the following finding: “That all the facts alleged in the complaint are true, but that, after the sales by the defendants *353 of the prunes and almonds as alleged in the complaint, the plaintiff ratified, approved and confirmed the acts of the defendants in making such sales.” Judgment was entered for the defendants, and this appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and the only question is whether the evidence is sufficient to justify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.