Neihaus

Neihaus v. Morgan

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1065·5 Cal. Unrep. 391·45 P. 255
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 2, 1896S. F. No. 244California2,085 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

The appellant, Mattie Morgan, wife of defendant Benjamin F. Morgan, being the owner of a lot in the town of Berkeley, County of Alameda, having a frontage of one hundred feet on Channing Way, and extending therefrom three hundred and four and one-half feet, entered into a written contract with defendants Higgins, Davidson & Co., by the terms of which the latter agreed to build two dwelling-houses on said lot, and to furnish all the materials therefor, and the former agreed to pay for the building of said houses $6,000, by certain installments, the last of which installments was to be paid when both houses should be completed. A memorandum of the contract was filed with the recorder of Alameda county before the commencement of the work, but did not state nor show that twenty-five per cent, or any part of the contract price for the building of said houses, or either of them, was made payable at least thirty-five days after the final completion of the work on said houses, or on either of them, or at any time after such completion, but did show that the final payment was to be made when and as soon as both houses should be completed, and all bills paid and liens waived. This action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.