Oullahan

Oullahan v. Baldwin

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1058·5 Cal. Unrep. 423·45 P. 1032
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 21, 1896Sac. No. 112California630 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

This action was brought by a real estate broker to recover commissions for services performed in finding a purchaser of certain real estate, Judgment went for respondents, and this appeal is prosecuted from that judgment, upon a bill of exceptions setting out the evidence. The court is now asked to reverse the judgment upon the evidence, and order a judgment for appellants; but it has no power to make such an order upon this record, for the findings of fact are against appellants, and it is only when those findings are favorable to an appellant that judgment may be ordered in his favor. Here those findings are attacked as unsupported by the evidence, and under such circumstances a new trial is all the relief that could be granted by this court, conceding the appeal to be meritorious. The case has been before the court in the past ( 100 Cal. 648 , 35 Pac. 310 ); and a new trial was then ordered upon practically the same grounds relied upon by this appeal, namely, the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact. At that time the case was carefully considered ■ from the standpoint of both law and fact, and for that reason we deem it unnecessary to now express our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.