Colfax Mountain Fruit Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1124·5 Cal. Unrep. 527·46 P. 668
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 24, 1896Sac. No. 87California1,632 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Britt, J.

At the trial of this case the parties agreed on the facts by written stipulation which was adopted by the court as its findings. It thus appears that on October 24, 1890, defendant was a common carrier operating a line of railroad between Colfax, in Placer county, and Ogden, Utah, the latter point being the terminus of its route in the direction of the city of New York. On that day defendant received from plaintiff at Colfax a carload of fruit for transportation according to the terms of a written contract called a “shipping order” signed by plaintiff, describing the goods to be carried, stating that the same were to be forwarded to Ogden station and there delivered, and containing also the following matter: “Consignee, marks, and destination: Sgobel & Day, New York.....Care C. & N. W., via Erie Dispatch, New York. Passenger train service, U. P. 32009. Agent Southern Pacific Company will please forward subject to conditions and agreements indorsed hereon.” One of such conditions was that: “The company agrees to forward the property to the place of destination named, but its responsibility as a common carrier is to cease at the station where the freight leaves this road, when the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.