Warren

Warren v. Connor

Good Law
1896 Cal. LEXIS 1123·5 Cal. Unrep. 537·47 P. 48
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 15, 1896Sac. No. 121California1,823 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This appeal is by the defendants from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The action is in trover for the conversion of certain personal property, consisting principally of farming implements, of the alleged value of $660. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the court found that the defendants had converted to their own use certain specified portions of the said property, of the value of $594. The .plaintiff claims title to the property in controversy through an alleged sale thereof by Thomas Hovenden to her. This property was upon a large ranch containing about three thousand nine hundred acres, which was formerly owned by George D. Connor and the defendant Sarah J. Connor, his wife. On December 23, 1890, said George D. Connor and Sarah J. Connor entered into a contract with said Hovenden to exchange said ranch for certain real estate owned by Hovenden. This contract provided that said Hovenden should have, in addition to the real estate, “one-fourth of all growing crops, and all the farming implements of every description now upon said premises, and also the McClennan and the Sanders barn, with all the hay, straw, etc., therein, for the sum or price…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.