Meeker

Meeker v. Shuster

Good Law
1897 Cal. LEXIS 935·5 Cal. Unrep. 578·47 P. 580
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 1897S. F. No. 374California2,043 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This is an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiff to recover possession of certain lands in Sonoma county of which, it is alleged, he is the owner in fee and entitled to possession. Judgment was entered for the defendants upon the findings, and plaintiff appeals therefrom and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

John Shuster, the husband of Sarah E., and father of the other defendants (James E. and Jacob F. Shuster), died seised of the demanded premises in July, 1883. On June 1, *579 1879, said John Shuster executed to Aaron Barnes his promissory note for $5,482.89, with interest, and a mortgage upon said premises to secure the same. On September 29, 1883, the claim of said Barnes upon said note and mortgage was allowed by the administrator of the estate of said John Shuster in the sum of $7,282.40. Said lands were inventoried at $8,000, and the personal property at $961.50, and a sale of said lands was ordered by the court to pay the debts of the estate. The defendants, the widow and two of the sons, desired to purchase the land, and applied to Barnes, the mortgagee, for assistance, and he consented to aid them in making the purchase. By arrangement with her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.