Ingham

Ingham v. Weed

Good Law
1897 Cal. LEXIS 983·5 Cal. Unrep. 645·48 P. 318
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1897L. A. No. 211California2,020 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to foreclose a mortgage, given to secure payment of two promis *646 sory notes of which they were the assignees. They obtained a judgment and decree of foreclosure as prayed for, from which, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, the defendants Weed, the McCarthys and the McCarthy Company, a corporation, appeal.

It appears from the record that prior to March 1, 1888, Edward McCarthy purchased the mortgaged premises from Charles E. Pittman and others. He paid part of the purchase money down, and gave to the sellers a mortgage for the balance. On March 1, 1888, this mortgage had been reduced, by payments made thereon from time to time, to $15,000, bearing interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum. Prior to that time Edward McCarthy had made contracts with various parties, and, among others, with respondents Thompson, Witter and Lyman, to sell to them undivided interests in the said lands for prices agreed upon, to be paid in installments. On March 1, 1888, a written agreement was entered into between Edward McCarthy, as party of the first part, the respondents Thompson, Witter and Lyman and all the other contractors for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.