Murphy v. City of San Luis Obispo

Good Law
1897 Cal. LEXIS 986·5 Cal. Unrep. 665·48 P. 974
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 20, 1897L. A. No. 273California3,371 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

This is an action brought to enjoin the defendants from selling or disposing of certain bonds issued, but not yet sold, by the city of San Luis Obispo (one of the defendants), and to restrain defendants from levying the taxes mentioned in the complaint, and from enforcing a certain ordinance of the said city. The cause was tried by the court, and judgment given for the defendants. The appeal is from the judgment, and also from the order of the court denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Appellant presents three grounds of attack upon the bonds in question: First, that The bonds are made payable in ‘ ‘ gold coin of the United States” instead of “gold coin or lawful money of the United States”; second, that the question as to whether the interest on the bonds would be payable annually or semi-annually was not submitted to the voters; and, third, that the voters voting for said bonds voted by stamping a cross opposite the propositions submitted to them, instead of indicating their wish by writing “Yes” or “No” opposite the proposition they desired to vote for. The regularity of the proceedings of the city authorities is not drawn in question, except as these may relate to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.