Firth

Mechanics' Institute v. Firth

Good Law
1897 Cal. LEXIS 987·5 Cal. Unrep. 721·49 P. 214
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 23, 1897S. F. No. 588California1,249 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

These appeals are from the judgment, and from the order denying plaintiff a new trial. Defendant Firth was the treasurer of the corporation plaintiff. The defendants Fretwell and Kerr are his bondsmen. Plaintiff sued to recover the sum of $600, alleged to have been misappropriated. The facts disclosed upon the trial were as follows: The moneys of the plaintiff corporation were deposited in a bank, and were paid out by treasurer’s checks upon presentation to him by the secretary of warrants ordered drawn by the board of directors." J. H. Culver was the secretary of the plaintiff, and its business or executive manager. In January, 1893, the plaintiff corporation was engaged in preparing for the twenty-seventh industrial exposition of the institute. Repairs were in progress at the Mechanics ’ Pavilion. Upon Saturday, January 7, 1893, it became necessary to pay the workmen. The pay-roll amounted to $1,878.20, the payment of about $1,200 of which was urgent. No warrants had been ordered drawn by the directors to meet this payment, and it was after banking hours when the secretary, Culver, communicated with the treasurer, asking him to procure what money he could, and bring it to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.