Truett

Truett v. Onderdonk

Good Law
1897 Cal. LEXIS 948·5 Cal. Unrep. 785·50 P. 394
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 1897S. F. No. 587California2,925 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

The plaintiff and defendant, many years ago, were copartners as contractors for the construction of sea-walls, filling in streets, and other similar work. On March 18, 1880, the plaintiff brought an action in the superior court of -San Francisco against the defendant for an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs, the appointment of a receiver and a dissolution of £he partnership, claiming that a large sum of money was due to him from the defendant, and specifying in his complaint a large number of contracts, some of which had been completed and others were in progress. The summons was issued therein, and served upon the defendant the same day. A few days afterward the plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement to submit their differences to one Thomas W. Scott, in which it was stipulated that said arbitrator should make his award within two days from that date, and that respondent should pay the amount of the award within twenty-four hours after notice thereof. Scott made his award, finding due to the plaintiff $32,000, and this amount was paid by the defendant, and a release was executed to him covering all matters existing between them; and on March 26,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.