Jackson v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.

Good Law
1898 Cal. LEXIS 1035·5 Cal. Unrep. 966·52 P. 838
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 8, 1898S. F. No. 928California1,289 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

This action was for money had and received. Defendants denied all indebtedness, and set up a counterclaim alleging that plaintiff was indebted to defendants for goods, wares and merchandise. When the case came on for trial the court made the following consent order: “ . . . . That this action be, and it is hereby, transferred to Stuart S. Wright, Esq., court commissioner of this court, for an accounting; said court commissioner to report back to this court the evidence taken, and the balance found due on said accounting.” The parties appeared before the commissioner, and introduced evidence; all objections thereto, of which there were several, being reserved and not passed upon by him. After the evidence was concluded and submitted, and before his decision or report, he tendered his resignation as court commissioner, which was accepted. Some time thereafter he filed his findings of fact and conclusions of law, and found a balance due plaintiff from defendants of $1,300, with interest and costs. Upon the filing of the report and findings of the commissioner, and the same day, the court ordered judgment entered “in accordance with the findings of the referee” (sic); and thereafter,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.