Thomas
Smith v. Thomas
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Plaintiff brought this action to contest the right of defendant to exercise the office of supervisor of the county of Tulare, for supervisor district No. 3 therein, for the term commencing January 4, 1897, to which said office defendant had been declared elected by the board of supervisors. The court found that three hundred and forty-six votes were counted by the board of election of the several precincts for defendant, and three hundred and forty-two votes for plaintiff, and that the board of supervisors thereupon canvassed said votes and the returns, and properly certified and declared defendant duly elected, and issued to him a certificate of election. The result of the trial was, and the court found, “that plaintiff and defendant each received and were entitled to have counted for them three hundred and forty-three legal votes cast at said election,” and, as conclusion of law, “that plaintiff take nothing by this action.” The appeal is from the judgment, and is presented by bill of exceptions.
1. Appellant’s first point arises from a certain ballot which it is claimed was erroneously counted for defendant. In the body of the ballot nothing irregular appears. Opposite the…