Gray

Gray v. Richardson

Good Law
1898 Cal. LEXIS 1046·6 Cal. Unrep. 200·55 P. 603
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1898S. F. No. 941California548 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The plaintiffs seek by this proceeding a writ of mandate compelling the defendant, as superintendent of streets in the city of San Rafael, to issue to them an assessment for certain street work done by them in that city. A contract for doing the work was awarded to the assignor of the plaintiffs, and, after the work had been completed to the satisfaction of the superintendent, an assessment therefor, with warrant and diagram attached, was made and issued to said assignor in February, 1894. After its issuance, the assessment and warrant were assigned to the plaintiffs, and they brought actions thereon to foreclose the lien of said as *201 sessment against certain parcels of the land that had been assessed. In these actions they were nonsuited, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendants therein. The present proceeding is instituted to obtain another assessment for the work, under the provisions of section 9 of the street improvement act. The superior court denied the application, and the plaintiffs have appealed therefrom.

Section 9 of the street improvement act provides: “Whenever it shall appear by any final judgment of any court in this state that any suit brought to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.