Nash

Nash v. Kreling

Good Law
1899 Cal. LEXIS 1177·6 Cal. Unrep. 233·56 P. 260
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1899S. F. No. 937California1,700 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Britt, J.

The trial of this case resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff avers that defendant employed him for a term of two years, beginning August 6, 1894, to be stage manager of a theater conducted by her, known as the “Tivoli Opera House,” in the city of San Francisco, at a salary of $90 per week for the first year, and $100 per week for the second. On June 2, 1895, she discharged him from said employment; and he sues in this action for alleged damages sustained by reason of such discharge during twelve weeks, beginning July 1, 1895, amounting, at the alleged rate of salary for that period, to $1,150. The defense is that plaintiff was employed from week to week only, and also that he so neglected the duties of his employment as to justify his discharge, even if his contract was for the fixed period alleged by him.

To establish the terms of the contract, plaintiff produced in evidence a series of letters and telegrams which passed between himself, at various points in the eastern states, and defendant, in San Francisco. From these it appeared that their negotiation related at first to an employment of plaintiff as stage manager of said theater for two years,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.