Finnell
Bank of Orland v. Finnell
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Gray, J.
The complaint sets forth, in substance, that in August, 1894, it was agreed between plaintiff, defendant, and James and William Deveney that the Deveneys should summer-fallow two thousand five hundred acres of land for defendant, and that, defendant should pay plaintiff the reasonable value thereof; that in the summer-fallowing season next ensuing, and subsequent to such agreement, the Deveneys did the summer-fallowing; that it was worth $1.50 an acre, or a total of $3,750. Then follows, in the complaint, this allegation: “That at the time of the entering into the said agreement, after the said plowing had been completed, the said Deveneys, for a valuable consideration, directed the said John Finnell to pay the plaintiff, and the said John Finnel agreed to pay the plaintiff, for the said plowing, as aforesaid.” The pleadings were not verified. The answer contained a general denial; also, an affirmative defense, in the nature of a novation, in which it was alleged that in October, 1894, defendant executed a two years lease to the Deveneys *246 of the land in question, and that plaintiff and the Deveneys accepted the same in full satisfaction and discharge of the claim set up in…