Long

San Francisco Savings Union v. Long

Good Law
6 Cal. Unrep. 278·56 P. 882
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 5, 1899S. F. No. 1041California75 words

lead Opinion

The motion to recall remittitur heretofore issued in this case is denied. It conforms to the judgment as rendered, and it is now too late to amend the judgment. The motion to amend our record nunc pro tunc, so as to show that the order made on the first day of November, 1898, was an order directing the amendment of the record by supplying the deficiency specified in. the plaintiff’s suggestion of diminution, is granted.