Meherin

Meherin v. Saunders

Good Law
1899 Cal. LEXIS 1148·6 Cal. Unrep. 279·56 P. 1110
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 13, 1899S. F. No. 1073California1,310 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Defendant Ambrose bid $10,000 for a piece of realty at an execution sale held by a constable. He paid the constable $855 in money, and gave his cheek for the balance of the purchase price. The money paid covered the judgment and costs, and the execution was returned satisfied. Thereafter payment of the check was stopped by Ambrose, and no more money was ever received under the sale. Upon this state of facts the judgment debtor’s assignee in insolvency, the plaintiff herein, brought an action against the constable and his bondsmen, and recovered damages to the amount of the balance of the purchase price against the constable, and to the amount of $1,000 against his bondsmen. Upon appeal that judgment was affirmed by this court: Meherin v. Saunders, 110 Cal. 463 , 42 Pac. 966 . Subsequent to the foregoing proceedings the assignee in insolvency brought this action against the constable and the defendant Ambrose, purchaser at the sale, for the balance of the purchase price. The constable defaulted, and Ambrose now appeals from the judgment rendered against him, and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

There are a great number of interesting questions raised by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.