Bradbury

Bradbury v. McHenry

Good Law
1899 Cal. LEXIS 1163·6 Cal. Unrep. 294·57 P. 999
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1899S. F. No. 803California1,453 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs to recover of defendants the sum of $2,034.45, alleged to be due upon an express contract for services rendered and material furnished in boring for defendants an artesian well. The facts as to the boring of the well and the value of the services and material were not controverted. The premises on which the well was bored belonged at all the times referred to in the complaint to the defendant Nellie McHenry, who is the wife of defendant John McHenry, but were leased to, and in the possession of, one James McHenry and Phillip L. Wooster,, partners under the name of Wooster & McHenry. James McHenry was a brother of defendant John McHenry. It was claimed by defendants that the well was bored at the request of, and under a contract with, the firm of Wooster & McHenry, and that defendants had nothing to do with the employment of plaintiffs in any manner. The question was as to whether plaintiffs’ contract was with defendants, as contended by plaintiffs, or with the firm of Wooster & McHenry. It was established without contradiction that, prior to the commencement of the present suit, the plaintiffs commenced an action against the firm of Wooster &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.