Hohman
Bering Strait School District v. Hohman
Opinion
Opinion
932 F.2d 972 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BERING STRAIT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald W. HOHMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-35370. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 19, 1990. * Decided Dec. 3, 1990. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, KILKENNY and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald W. Hohman appeals the district court's denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from the court's grant of default in favor of the Bering Strait School District. The district court concluded Hohman's motion was untimely and without merit. We affirm. 3 Under Rule 60(b), the district court may relieve a party from a final judgment on the basis of any of several enumerated reasons, including "mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect" and "any other reason justifying relief." Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) & (6). A motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) must be brought…