Methvin

Methvin v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n

Good Law
1899 Cal. LEXIS 1171·6 Cal. Unrep. 332·58 P. 387
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 1899L. A. No. 720California1,026 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

This action is based upon a policy of life insurance. Plaintiff recovered, and the appeal is taken from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial.

*333 Had the policy lapsed‘and become forfeited at the time of the death -of the insured 1 These are the facts: "While the policy was dated July 30, 1895, it was not delivered to the insured until the third day of the following September, at which time the first quarterly premium was paid. There is a clause in the policy providing that it would be in no way binding, or of any force or effect, until delivered to the insured and the first quarterly premium paid. It necessarily follows that the contract of insurance went into effect September 3, 1895. A quarterly premium of $24.96 was to be paid for the period of twenty years, on or before the thirtieth day of July, October, June and April of each year. Upon this state of facts, it is manifest that when the insured received his policy and paid his quarterly premium he was insured for three months from September 3d, the date when the policy went into force and effect. The insured died in November, 1895, and we see no reason why his policy of insurance was not alive and in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.